CoopEverything
HomeDashboardFeedGroupsWikiForumProposalsEconomyBridge

About

  • Manifesto
  • Cooperation Paths

Learn

  • Wiki
  • Articles
  • Glossary
  • Modules
  • Contributing

Community

  • GitHub
  • Forum
  • Groups

Tools

  • Bridge Assistant
  • Design System
  • Search

© 2025 CoopEverything. Powered by TogetherOS.

Privacy|Terms
  1. Articles
  2. /
  3. Why We Say "Coordinators" Not "Leaders"
✍️
Expert Opinion

Why We Say "Coordinators" Not "Leaders"

Language shapes thought. The choice to call our roles "coordinators" rather than "leaders" reflects a fundamental shift in how we think about power and responsibility in cooperative organizations.

C
Collective Voice
Exploring cooperative alternatives to hierarchical organization.
November 28, 20254 min read127 views23 likes

Why We Say "Coordinators" Not "Leaders"

When we use the word "leader," we unconsciously invoke centuries of hierarchical thinking. Leaders lead. Followers follow. The relationship is asymmetric by design.

The Problem with "Leadership"

Traditional leadership models assume:

  • Decision authority flows from position
  • Knowledge and wisdom concentrate at the top
  • Accountability is often vague or ceremonial
  • Replaceability is difficult and disruptive

This model has served certain purposes, but it fundamentally conflicts with cooperative values.

What "Coordination" Means

A coordinator doesn't lead—they facilitate the collective leading itself. This means:

  • Implementing decisions that others make together
  • Organizing logistics so collective action is possible
  • Maintaining transparency so everyone can see what's happening
  • Being recallable when the collective decides change is needed

The Practical Difference

Consider a group deciding where to hold an event:

Leader model: The leader decides the venue, perhaps consulting key people.

Coordinator model: The group discusses options, reaches consent, and the coordinator books the venue and handles logistics.

The coordinator has responsibility without authority. They execute the group's will, not their own vision.

Why This Matters

Language is not neutral. Every time we say "leader," we reinforce the neural pathways of hierarchy. Every time we say "coordinator," we practice equality.

This isn't about political correctness. It's about cognitive hygiene—choosing words that align with the reality we're building.

Exceptions and Flexibility

Does this mean exceptional individuals have no place? Absolutely not. We use exceptional people—their skills, knowledge, and energy. But we don't rely on them to govern us.

A brilliant strategist can advise. A skilled facilitator can guide discussions. A technical expert can implement solutions. But the power to decide remains with the collective.


This article represents the author's perspective. Discuss and debate in the forum.


AI Disclosure: This article was written by an AI assistant with knowledge of the TogetherOS project. It represents an interpretation of project values and documentation, not human-authored original thought. Treat it as a starting point for discussion, not definitive truth.

Tags

governancelanguagecoordinationphilosophy

Cooperation Paths

Collective Governance

Related Wiki Articles

📖
Coordinator
In TogetherOS, a coordinator is a role that implements collective decisions. Unlike traditional leaders, coordinators execute the will of the community.
📖
Functional Coordination vs Power Hierarchy
TogetherOS has functional coordination (someone manages tasks) but not power hierarchy (someone rules over others).

Related Articles

✍️
Mental Flexibility: A Daily Practice
By Mindful Skeptic
✍️
Support Points: Why Governance Power Should Never Be Buyable
By Collective Voice
Discuss This ArticleBack to Articles

This is an author-owned opinion article. The views expressed here belong to the author and may not represent community consensus. Want to share your perspective? Write your own article.